The Synchronicity Engine Architecture
The Synchronicity Engine system is comprised of two parts:
The first part is the Synchronicity Engine. It is a dynamic content display generator based on
Synchronicity (Acausal Physics), Fractal Mathematics and Chaos Theory. It uses a computer
and a display to act as a transducer converting electrical energy into a ever changing flowing
pattern of Chi Energy. A transducer is a device that changes one form of energy into another
form, such as SONAR converts electricity into sound energy. (see the Synchronicity Engine
Technology document for more details). This is the fundamental essence of the Synchronicity
Engine technology.
The Synchronicity Engine, in software architectural terms, is the same as a program such as
Word or Excel. The Synchronicity Engine takes a Linguistic ( which is a document that
contains instructions on creating dynamically composed phrases ) and converts them into a
continuously changing flowing display. These flowing patterns are displayed on computer
displays which convert electricity/light into flowing Chi energy.
The second part is the Linguistics which, architecturally, are the equivalent of the words or
verbiage that are in each Word or Excel document. These Linguistics are used by the
Synchronicity Engine to provide the background text used on the computer screens. Different
Linguistics have been created each creating a different flowing text background. Ms. Michael
and I co-developed her Linguistic and Ms. Michael has the Intellectual Property rights to that
Linguistic and only that Linguistic.
Regarding Ms. Michael’s claims to have created a technology and to her Intellectual Property –
Ms. Michael has not created a Technology, Ms. Michael created an artistic work. The
Synchronicity Engine is a Technology, a Linguistic is Artistic work. The Synchronicity Engine
is my Intellectual Property. Ms. Michael’s Intellectual property is only her Linguistic. Ms.
Michael was issued only a non-exclusive license not ownership of the Synchronicity Engine
technology.
An analogous situation would be Microsoft’s Word. When Microsoft sells it’s Word software it
is actually selling a non-exclusive license to use a copy of the software. It is not selling rights to
the Word software. Documents created in Word are analogous to Linguistics created in the
Synchronicity Engine technology. Many documents can be created using the Word technology.
Creating a new document doesn’t create a new technology – similarly creating a new linguistic
doesn’t create a new technology.
Technology vs. Artistry. An example of technology vs artistry would be CD player vs the songs
it would play. The CD player is Technology. The songs played on the CD player are Artistry.
Playing songs on the CD player doesn’t create a new technology.
In summary – the Synchronicity Engine is Technology and Linguistics are Artistry.
I own the Technology.
Robert Jon Religa